Ring Smart Security System “Unjustifiably Invaded” Privacy, Court Rules – channelnews
A UK judge ruled that a smart security system installed in an Oxfordshire home “unjustifiably invaded” a neighbor’s privacy.
Dr Mary Fairhurst claimed that various smart devices installed by neighbor Jon Woodard “violate data laws and contribute to harassment.”
The judge ruled in favor of the complainant, after learning that the Ring doorbell was taking images of her house and her garden, while another camera installed in the shed captured her entire garden and her parking lot.
In addition, microphones that could record conversations, and could not be turned off, were judged by the judge to be “even more problematic and damaging than video data”.
“Personal data can be captured by people who do not even know the device is there, or that it is recording and processing audio and personal data,” she said in her judgment, which constitutes a violation of both UK data protection law and UK. GDPR.
Woodard said the cameras were installed in good faith, to deter break-ins.
Amazon said in a statement, âWe have implemented features on all of our devices to ensure that privacy, security and user control remain at the forefront, including customizable privacy zones to block the zones. âOut of boundsâ motion zones to control the areas where customers want their Ring device to detect motion and the audio toggle to turn sound on and off. “
The judge was not convinced by this, adding: âEven if an activation zone is deactivated so that the camera does not activate to film by movement in that zone, the activation by movement in one of the other activation areas not deactivated will cause the camera to film over the entire field of view.